Sunday, March 17, 2013

Superficial or Sincere

Although social media may create awareness, does social and political action through online media make deep, lasting and revolutionary change?  Or do you think that it only gives the appearance of such action but tricks people into thinking they are making a difference when they really aren’t?  Slactivism refers to superficial involvement where people participate without being motivated to take their activism or interest beyond clinking like, view or send.)  Discuss your views. 
First, let’s define a few words used to describe change.
Revolutionary: 
  • A revolutionary is a person who either actively participates in, or advocates revolution.
  • When used as an adjective, the term revolutionary refers to something that has a major, sudden impact on society or on some aspect of human endeavor.
When we think revolutionary change, we envision complete overhaul, renovation and reconstruction.  Change is fundamental, dramatic, and often irreversible[1]- transformational change. 
The term "social revolution" may be used to refer to a massive change in society.[2]
Evolution:
  • A gradual process in which something changes into a different and usually more complex or better form.
  • Evolutionary change is incremental and takes place gradually, over time.
Summary of the two words:
  • Revolutionary = major sudden impact, massive, transformation change.
  • Evolution = gradual, incremental change. 
By way of definition, I do not believe social media can make a deep, lasting, and revolutionary change.   However, again by definition, social media is making an evolutionary change.  It is a gradual, incremental change. 
Now, let’s define Activism and Slacktivism;
Activism:
  •  The definition of activism is the use of direct action to achieve an end, either for or against an issue[3].
  • When people tie themselves to trees to protect the forest from being cut down, it is an example of activism.
Slacktivism.[4]
  • Slacktivism is a term that combines the words "slacker" and "activism" to refer to simple measures used to support an issue or social cause involving virtually no effort on the part of participants.
  • Slacktivism is most commonly associated with actions like signing online petitions, copying social network statuses or joining cause-related social networking groups.
  • Slacktivism critics contend these actions are merely for participant gratification because they lack engagement and commitment and fail to produce any tangible effect, in terms of promoting a cause.
Slacktivism, as the name suggests, involves supporting a cause on an individual level without doing much to support the big picture.  The vastness of social media makes these acts incredibly easy. You can share a picture to let your Facebook friends know you care. Twitter has a hashtag for every cause. You can show your support by clicking like.  But, do any of these actions causes real change? 
If an individual takes their actions past just clicking like, sharing a photo, or story it can provide empowering opportunities for people all around the world to stand together in solidarity, either for or against a cause.   It does bring like-minded people together and create a greater force.  However, individuals armed with information must still do something with it. 
Picture the example of activism – when people tie themselves to trees to protect the forest being cut down.   What if the only act from 100, 000 people were clicking like on a Facebook page?   How does that help? 
I actually do think social media can fool some people into thinking they are making a difference when they really aren’t.  Let’s look at the tree picture again.   We have one person tied to the tree, fighting for a cause, meanwhile the rest of the 100,000 people are at home – yet they agree with him, “save the forest”, they clicked like.  Even though all these people agree with him in saving the forest, he is totally alone, tied to the tree, trying to save the forest.   This is a very simple example, but I do hope you are catching what I am trying to say. 
I am not saying that every individual has to go out and tie themselves to a tree, but there are meaningful ways to help after clicking like or sharing a photo or story.  Individuals can write letters in support of (or against) a cause to public officials or individuals who have authority to address issues of public interest.    An individual could also help by donating money to a worthy cause.  The majority of people cannot physically be right in the midst of it but they can feel a part of it by assisting financially.  Always research first how donations are spent by the organization before supporting them.  No one likes to see 90% of their donation going to administration expenses.